F.A.Q
Hand In Hand
Online Acmers
Problem Archive
Realtime Judge Status
Authors Ranklist
 
     C/C++/Java Exams     
ACM Steps
Go to Job
Contest LiveCast
ICPC@China
Best Coder beta
VIP | STD Contests
    DIY | Web-DIY beta
Author ID 
Password 
 Register new ID

View Compilation Error

0_0_9303897_22559.cpp: In function `bool check(ll)':
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:62: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator*(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: note: candidate 2: operator*(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:54: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator+(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: note: candidate 2: operator+(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:58: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator-(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: note: candidate 2: operator-(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:54: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator+(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: note: candidate 2: operator+(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:62: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator*(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: note: candidate 2: operator*(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:58: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator-(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: note: candidate 2: operator-(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:54: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator+(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:142: note: candidate 2: operator+(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp: In function `int main()':
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:164: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:58: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator-(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:164: note: candidate 2: operator-(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:164: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:54: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator+(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:164: note: candidate 2: operator+(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:165: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:58: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator-(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:165: note: candidate 2: operator-(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:165: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:54: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator+(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:165: note: candidate 2: operator+(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:166: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:58: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator-(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:166: note: candidate 2: operator-(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:166: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:54: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator+(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:166: note: candidate 2: operator+(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:172: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:58: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator-(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:172: note: candidate 2: operator-(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:172: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:54: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator+(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:172: note: candidate 2: operator+(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:175: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:62: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator*(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:175: note: candidate 2: operator*(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:179: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:58: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator-(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:179: note: candidate 2: operator-(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:179: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:54: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator+(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:179: note: candidate 2: operator+(long long int, int) <built-in>
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:185: error: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst conversion for the second:
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:66: note: candidate 1: ll ll::operator/(long long int) const
0_0_9303897_22559.cpp:185: note: candidate 2: operator/(long long int, int) <built-in>


Hangzhou Dianzi University Online Judge 3.0
Copyright © 2005-2024 HDU ACM Team. All Rights Reserved.
Designer & Developer : Wang Rongtao LinLe GaoJie GanLu
Total 0.000000(s) query 1, Server time : 2024-11-23 02:25:55, Gzip enabled